ANALISIS PEMBELAJARAN AKTIF BERBASIS KETERAMPILAN ABAD 21 PADA GURU MI DI KOTA SEMARANG

Kristi Liani Purwanti; Zuanita Adriyani; Ega Fatmawati

doi:10.31602/muallimuna.v8i1.5906

ANALISIS PEMBELAJARAN AKTIF BERBASIS KETERAMPILAN ABAD 21 PADA GURU MI DI KOTA SEMARANG

Kristi Liani Purwanti^(1*), Zuanita Adriyani⁽²⁾, Ega Fatmawati⁽³⁾

(1) Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
(2) Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
(3) Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of 21st century skills-based active learning at partner MI of UIN Walisongo Semarang after obtaining training and mentoring since 2018. This study is a qualitative field research with fourth grade teachers at partner MI of UIN Walisongo Semarang as the subjects. The partner MI of UIN Walisongo are MI Nashrul Fajar, MI Taufiqiyah, MI Tarbiyatul Khairat, MI Al Khoirriyah 02 and MI Al Hikmah. Data collection techniques were carried out through an observation of the learning process, the documentation of reviewing the lesson plan and worksheets as well as interviews. Data analysis in this study consists of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The conclusion shows that critical thinking indicators are not distinguishable in the lesson plan as the teacher has not given students the opportunity to explain their mind in their own language. The indicators of collaboration and communication have not been implemented optimally in the learning process. This is because it is not possible to have discussions or close interactions during the pandemic, students were keeping their distance from each other while paying attention to health protocols. In addition, the majority of communication indicators that are implemented tend to be the results of individual work, not the results of discussions. The submission of the learning conclusions is more likely to be delivered by the teacher at the end of the learning process, not delivered by students directly. Indicators of creativity and critical thinking have not been appeared optimally in the worksheets. In the worksheets, the teacher has not given the freedom for students to determine how to complete the task and has not provided the assignments that require students' creativity. Questions given by teachers mostly only require students to repeat the ideas or material from the teacher rather than producing students' own ideas.

Keywords

active learning; 21st century skills

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andira, A. D., Fauzi, A., & Rifai, H. (2017). Pengaruh Penggunaan LKPD Terintegrasi Materi Abrasi Pantai Terhadap Kompetensi Peserta Didik dalam Model Inkuiri Learning Pada Materi Gelombang Di Kelas XI SMA N 2 Painan. Pillar of Physics Education, 10, 169-176

Arnetis, M. N., & Ayuni, S. (2014). Penilaian Berbasis Kelas untuk Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran IPA Biologi SMP. Jurnal Biogenesis, 11(1), 43–48.

Astutik, P., & Haryati, N. (2021). Peran Guru dan Strategi Pembelajaran dalam Penerapan Keterampilan Abad 21 pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jurnal Inspirasi Manajemen Pendidikan, 9(3), 619–638.

Ermila M, Irwansah, Murniatun, & Mediawati. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Guru Dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Peserta Didik Pada Pembelajaran Biologi Sma. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education. Jige 2 (1) 96-103

Greenstein, L. M. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Guide To Evaluating mastery and authentic learning.

Hadi, S. (2017). Pemeriksaan Keabsahan Data Penelitian Kualitatif Pada Skripsi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 22(1), Article 1.

Hariri, C. A., & Yayuk, E. (2018). Penerapan Model Experiential Learning untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Cahaya dan Sifat-Sifatnya Siswa Kelas 5 SD. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 8(1), 1–15.

Junedi, B., Mahuda, I., & Kusuma, J. W. (2020). Optimalisasi keterampilan pembelajaran abad 21 dalam proses pembelajaran pada Guru MTs Massaratul Mut’allimin Banten. Transformasi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 16(1), 63–72.

Juwita Sari, I., Murni, D., & Sjaifuddin, S. (2016). Peningkatan Kecakapan Komunikasi Siswa Menggunakan Pembelajaran Bilingual Preview Review Dengan Setting Jigsaw Pada Konsep Pengelolaan Lingkungan. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 2(2), 121–130.

Leen, Hong, & Ying. (2014). Leen, C.C., Hong, K.F.F.H., dan Ying, T.W. 2014. Creative and Critical Thinking in Singapore Schools. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. Nanyang Technological University.

Mulyasana, D., & Fauzia, A. (2015). Pendidikan Bermutu dan Berdaya Saing. Remaja Rosda Karya.

Prawanti, L. T., & Sumarni, W. (2020). Kendala Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemic Covid-19. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 3(1), 286–291.

Rafianti, I., Anriani, N., & Iskandar, K. (2018). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Dalam Mendukung Kemampuan Abad 21. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 123–138.

Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad ke-21 dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(3).

Rijali, A. (2019). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Alhadharah: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, 17(33), 81–95.

Septikasari, R., & Frasandy, R. N. (2018). Keterampilan 4c Abad 21 Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Dasar. Tarbiyah Al-Awlad, 8(2), 107–117.

Sugiyarti, L., Arif, A., & Mursalin, M. (2018). Pembelajaran Abad 21 di Sekolah Dasar. Prosiding Seminar dan Diskusi Nasional Pendidikan Dasar.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tim Tanoto Foundation. (2018). Modul I: Pembelajaran Aktif. Tanoto Foundation.

Ulanda A. et. al. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Guru dalam Menyusun Soal Evaluasi Berbasis Hots Pada Pembelajaran Matematika di SDN Torongrejo 2. Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan, 2(1), 2022

Widhy H. (2013). Langkah Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA Pada Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Pelatihan Diklat Penyusunan Worksheet Integreted Science Process Skill Bagi Guru SMP. Sleman

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/muallimuna.v8i1.5906