Hubungan antara Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge dengan Technology Integration Self Efficacy Guru Matematika di Sekolah Dasar

Dessy Noor Ariani

doi:10.31602/muallimuna.v1i1.277

Hubungan antara Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge dengan Technology Integration Self Efficacy Guru Matematika di Sekolah Dasar

Dessy Noor Ariani^(1*)

(1) Dosen Prodi Penddikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Indonesia

Pendahuluan: Tujuan utama dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tingkat Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) atau teknologi pedagogis pengetahuan konten, tingkat technology integration self efficacy (TISE) atau efficacy diri dalam mengintegrasikan teknologi dan hubungan antara TPACK dan TISE pada guru matematika di sekolah dasar. Metode: Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kuantitatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan instrumen TPACK Survey Instrument (Pamuk et al., 2013) untuk mengukur teknologi pedagogis pengetahuan konten guru dan Computer Technology Integration Survey (CTIS) (Wang et al., 2004) untuk mengukur efficacy diri peserta dalam mengintegrasikan teknologi pada proses mengajar. Hasil: TPACK dan TISE responden berada pada tingkat sederhana. Hasil pada uji hiphothesis menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara TPACK dan TISE. Kesimpulan: Kemampuan TISE dan TPACK sangat dipelukan untuk guru matematika sekolah dasar dalam pengembangkan strategi khusus dalam integrasi teknologi yang mendukung standar pembelajaran di dalam kelas yang berintegrasi teknologi.

English

Introduction:The main purpose of this study is to identify the level of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), the level of technology integration self efficacy (TISE) and the relationships between TPACK and TISE among mathematics teachers in primary schools. Method: A descriptive quantitative research design was implemented in this study to achieve this purpose. The instruments used in this study are TPACK survey instrument (Pamuk et al., 2013) to measure teacher’s technological pedagogical content knowledge and Computer Technology Integration Survey (CTIS) (Wang et al., 2004) to measure participants’ technology integration self efficacy in teaching. Result: The finding of descriptive analysis was that the majority of the respondents reported moderate level of TPACK and TISE. The finding of hyphothesis test shows that there are significant relationships between TPACK and TISE. Conclusion: TPACK and TISE capability of primary schools Mathematics teachers is important to develop their integrated technology competence in teaching.

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Abbitt, J.T (2011) An Investigation of the Relationship between Self-Efficacy Beliefs about Technology Integration and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) among Preservice Teachers, Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27:4, 134-143, DOI:10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670.

Agyei, D. D. & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers through collaborative design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 547-564. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet28/agyei.html.

Angeli, C. & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006

Benson, S. (2004). Computer anxiety: Impediment to technology integration? http://pt3.nmsu.edu/research/Benson.html.

Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3).

Budiman, H. 2011. Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Matematis Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Berbantuan Software Cabri 3D. Prosiding. http://www.pustaka.ut.ac.id/dev25/pdfprosiding2/fmipa201141.pdf

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.

Ferdig, R. E. (2006). Assessing technologies for teaching and learning: Understanding the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 749–760.

Gao, P., Tan, S. C., Wang, L., Wong, A. & Choy, D. (2011). Self reflection and preservice teachers' technological pedagogical knowledge: Promoting earlier adoption of student-centred pedagogies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 997-1013. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/gao.html

Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(2), 155-192.

Hsioung, Yu-Lu. (2002). Preservice teacher preparation to integrate technology and mathematics. Review of Literature.

Idris, N. (2006). Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Kuala Lumpur : Utusan Publications & Distributors SDN BHD.

IMSTEP-JICA. (1999). Monitoring Report on Current Practice on Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning. Bandung :IMSTEP- JICA

Jones, A. (2004). A Review of The Research Literature on Barriers to The Uptake of ICT By Teachers. UK: Becta .

Keengwe, J., G. Onchwari, & Onchwari, J. (2009). Technology And Student Learning: Toward A Learner-Centered Teaching Model. AACE Journal, 17(2), 11-22. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.0rg/f/26258

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Indonesia (Kemendikbud). (2012). Buku Data Profil Guru dan Data Hasil Uji Kompetensi Guru (UKG) Online tahun 2012. Kalimantan Selatan: Lembaga Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan (LPMP).

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Indonesia (Kemendikbud). (2013). Buku Data Profil Guru dan Data Hasil Uji Kompetensi Guru (UKG) Online tahun 2013. Kalimantan Selatan: Lembaga Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan (LPMP).

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Indonesia (Kemendikbud). (2013). Kurikulum 2013. http://www.kemdiknas.go.id/

Keong, C.C., Horani, S & Daniel, J. (2005). A Study on the use of ICT in mathematics teaching. Malaysian Online Journal Of Instructional Technology (MOJIT).2,(3).

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 131–152.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740-762.

Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.

Lee, M. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science, 38(1), 1-21.DOI 10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4

McDonnough, J., & Matkins, J. (2010). The role of teaching practice in elementary preservice teachers’ self efficacy and ability to connect research practice. School Science and Mathematics, 110(1), 13-23.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Nathan, E. J. (2009). An Examination of the Relationship between Preservice Teachers' Level of Technology Integration Self-Efficacy (TISE) and Level of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Available from Proquest Dissertasion and These Database (UMI: 3388727).

Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper, S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Özgün-Koca, S. A & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 4-24.

Niess, M., Browning, C., Driskell, S., Johnston, C., & Harrington, R. (2009, March). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and revising teacher preparation. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Vol. 2009, No. 1, pp. 3588-3601).

Pamuk, S., Ergun, M., Cakir, R., Yilmaz, H. B., & Ayas, C. (2013). Exploring relationships among TPACK components and development of the TPACK instrument. Education and Information Technologies, 1-23.

Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. (2008). Individual Characteristics and Computer Self-Efficacy In Secondary Education Teachers To Integrate Technology In Educational Practice. Computers & Education, 50(3), 1084-1091.

Roussos, P. (2002). Computer attitude correlates: Do they tell us anything new? http://psychology.uindy.gr/ICTE_paper_Roussos.pdf.

Schoen, L., & Fusarelll, L. (2008). Innovation,NCLB, and the fear factor: The challenge of leading schools in the 21st century. Educational Policy , 181-203.

Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand; Knowledge growth in teaching, Education Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Tay, L., Lim, S. K., Lim, P. C., & Koh, J. ,. (2012). Pedagogical Approaches for ICT Integration into Primary School English and Mathematics : Singapore Case Study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology , 740-754.

Wang, L., Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2004). Increasing Preservice Teachers' Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Technology Integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/muallimuna.v1i1.277