ANALISIS PERBEDAAN METAKOGNISI SISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN KIMIA DITINJAU DARI GENDER DAN PRESTASI AKADEMIK

Eka Frima Asda

doi:10.31602/dl.v7i2.15886

ANALISIS PERBEDAAN METAKOGNISI SISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN KIMIA DITINJAU DARI GENDER DAN PRESTASI AKADEMIK

Eka Frima Asda^(1*)

(1) Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Sari

Penelitian didasari oleh pernyataan Kemendikbud, bahwa kurikulum merdeka diharapkan dapat mempersiapkan siswa dalam menghadapi abad 21 dengan membangun Metakognisi siswa. Oleh karena itu tujuan penelitian ini adalah, untuk mendeskripsikan aktifitas yang dapat membangun metakognisi siswa dalam pembelajaran kimia yang ditinjau dari perbedaan akademik masing-masing gender. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dengan pendekatan kualitatif, dengan partisipan berjumlah 56 siswa. Data dikumpulkankan menggunakan lembar wawancara dan lembar observasi metakognisi melalui aktifitas belajar siswa. Penelitian dilaksanakan di salah satu madrasah aliyah negeri di kabupaten pesisir selatan tahun ajaran 2023/2024. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan metakognisi siswa dengan kemampuan akademik tinggi, sedang, dan rendah ditemukan perbedaan dalam mepembelajaran kimia. Siswa kemampuan akademik tinggi cenderung lebih baik dalam memahami materi kimia dibandingkan siswa kemampuan akademik rendah. Berdasarkan tinjauan perbedaan gender, perempuan cenderung lebih baik untuk membangun metakognisinya dibandingkan siswa laki-laki. Oleh karena itu, aktifitas membangun metakognisi dapat dilakukan melalui tahap perencanaan pembelajaran, monitoring dan evaluasi.

Kata Kunci

Metakognisi siswa; Pemecahan Masalah; Gender; Prestasi Akademik

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Adita, E. R., & Azizah, U. (2016). Keterampilan metakognitif siswa melalui model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing pada materi pokok laju reaksi di sman 1 manyar gresik kelas xi. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 5(1), 143–151.

Akben, N. (2020). Effects of the problem-posing approach on students’ problem solving skills and metacognitive awareness in science education. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1143–1165. Https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9726-7

Asda, E. F. (2024). Literatur review : kesadaran metakognisi menggunakan model pembelajaran guided inquiry.

Asda, E. F., Andromeda, A., Yerimadesi, Y., & Fitriza, Z. (2023). Pedagogical competence of chemistry education student to implement guided inquiry learning model in lesson study learning community based microteaching course. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2673(December 2022).

Asda, E. F., Effendi, E., Maaruf, A., Fathony, H., & Hidayati, I. (2022). The validity of e-learning chemistry learning in sma / ma project based learning on hydrocarbons using the flipped classroom approach in class xi senior high school. International Journal of High Information, Computerization, Engineering and Applied Science (Jhice), 2(01), 1–9.

Asda, E. F., & Iryani, I. (2020). Validitas dan praktikalitas modul titrasi asam dan basa berbasis inkuiri terbimbing dilengkapi soal-soal tipe hots. Edukimia, 2(1), 12–17.

Asy’ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali. (2019). The effectiveness of inquiry learning model in improving prospective teachers’ metacognition knowledge and metacognition awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 455–470.

Barokah, I., Budiyono, & Saputro, D. R. S. (2020). Mathematics module based on problem-based learning to improve students’ metacognition. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1613(1).

Biscocho, S. S. (2021). Metacognitive knowledge , skills and attitude of science metacognitive knowledge , skills and attitude of science technology and society students across programs. Luz y Saber, 15(1).

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Dasna, I. W., & Putri, P. A. W. (2022). Improving the quality of online chemistry learning – A systematic literature review. Improving Assessment and Evaluation Strategies on Online Learning, 129–134.

Dincol Ozgur, S. (2021). Chemistry self-efficacy beliefs as predictors of students’ metacognitive skills when solving chemistry problems. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 2021(1), 132–147.

Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 83–87.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Helen. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education. in syria studies (Vol. 7, Issue 1). Rineka Cipta.

Galbally, P., & Christodoulidi, F. (2023). Personalised learning pedagogies and the impact on student progression and retention: the case of counselling training within a university setting. Teaching in Higher Education, May, 1–20. Https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2211933

Guo, X., Deng, W., Hu, K., Lei, W., Xiang, S., & Hu, W. (2022). The effect of metacognition on students’ chemistry identity: the chain mediating role of chemistry learning burnout and chemistry learning flow. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(2), 408–421.

Huda, K., Suyanta, Priambodo, Y. A., Ardwiyanti, D., Usman, M., & Alvionita, D. (2021). The Improvement of students’ metacognition skills on natural science education using guided inquiry models. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1).

Ijirana, Aminah, S., Supriadi, & Magfirah. (2022). Critical thinking skills of chemistry education students in team project-based stem-metacognitive skills learning during the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 397–409.

Ilma, S., Al-Muhdhar, M. H. I., Rohman, F., & Sari, M. S. (2022). Promoting students’ metacognitive awareness and cognitive learning outcomes in science education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 20–30.

Juanda, I. (2019). Peningkatan mutu pendidikan dalam perspektif manajemen berbasis sekolah. Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi Antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam, 18(1), 1–22.

Kemendikbud. (2019). Strategi metakognisi pada implementasi pembelajaran kurikulum 2013. Strategi Metakognisi Pada Implementasi Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013.

Linanti, A. T., Anwar, Y., & Santoso, L. M. (2017). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing (guided inquiry) terhadap keterampilan metakognitif peserta didik kelas XI SMA negeri 19 Palembang pada materi sistem ekskresi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA 2017, 538–548.

Mastrothanais, K., Kalianou, M., Katsifi, S., & Zouganali, A. (2018). The use of metacognitive knowledge and regulation strategies of students with and without special learning difficulties. International Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 184–200.

Minata, Z. S., Rahayu, S., & Dasna, I. W. (2022). Context-Based Chemistry Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(4), 1446–1463. Https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i4.pp1446-1463

Mulyadi, M. (2022). Teori belajar konstruktivisme dengan model pembelajaran (inquiry). Al Yasini : Jurnal Keislaman, Sosial, Hukum Dan Pendidikan, 7(2), 174.

Nurwidodo, W., & Pujiastuti, P. (2019). Peningkatan Keaktifan Dan Prestasi Belajar IPA Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Science Education Quality Improvement Project (SEQIP) pada Siswa Kelas IV CI Hasan Al Rammah SD Muhammadiyah Sapen Yogyakarta. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Ola, R. A. T. (2019). Hubungan keterampilan metakognisi dengan peningkatan hasil belajar. Seminar Nasional Biologi, 151–156.

Parlan, P., Astutik, N. A. I., & Su’aidy, M. (2019). Analisis pengetahuan metakognitif dan kesadaran metakognitif peserta didik serta hubungannya dengan prestasi belajarnya pada materi larutan penyangga. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 4(1), 1–13.

Piaget, jean. (2002). Tingkat Perkembangan Kognitif. Gramedia Pustaka.

Pramusinta, Y., Setyosari, P., Widiati, U., & Kuswandi, D. (2019). Exploring metacognitive and critical thinking skills of pre-service elementary school teachers through discovery learning method by integrating various cognitive styles. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 999–1017.

Pulukuri, S., & Abrams, B. (2021). Improving learning outcomes and metacognitive monitoring: replacing traditional textbook readings with question-embedded videos. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(7), 2156–2166.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. In Contemporary Educational Psychology (Vol. 19, Issue 4, pp. 460–475).

Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children’s knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 51–79.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitaif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sutama, Anif, S., Prayitno, H. J., & Sari, D. P. (2019). Metacognitive knowledge of mathematics education students in analytical geometry of space. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1211(1).

Suwono, H., Susanti, S., & Lestari, U. (2017). Guided inquiry facilitated blended learning to improve metacognitive and learning outcome of high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 755(1).

Tok, E. (2022). Pre-service preschool teachers’ metacognitive awareness and creative thinking domains. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(3), 71–78. Https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10i3.4675

Vo, K., Sarkar, M., White, P. J., & Yuriev, E. (2022). Problem solving in chemistry supported by metacognitive scaffolding: teaching associates’ perspectives and practices. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 23(2), 436–451.

Wijayanto, P. S., Setiawan, W., & Firmansyah, A. (2020). Meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa melalui media youtube ( podcast ) dengan metode pembelajaran pendidikan jarak jauh pada materi komputer dan jaringan dasar di smkn 3 bandung. Jurnal Guru Komputer, 1(1), 50–62.

Winarti, Ambaryani, S. E., & Putranta, H. (2022). Improving learners’ metacognitive skills with self-regulated learning based problem-solving. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 139–154.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/dl.v7i2.15886