Pamungkur Pamungkur(1*)

(1) STIE Kuala Kapuas
(*) Corresponding Author


In order to promote competition, company should be able to provide its customers with satisfaction, for instance by giving products with better quality, affordable, better service than the competitors. Customers satisfaction or unsatisfaction becomes a national, global, industrial and service company trending topic. Customers satisfaction is considered by goods/service quality customers expect. Therefore, quality assurance is the main priority for every company, particularly now that is perceived as a competition excellence benchmark for company. This study aimed (a) to analyze the conformity between interest level of service components according to customers with the performance done by Bank Mandiri and (b) to analyze customers satisfaction on services provided so as to contribute the performance of Bank Mandiri to achieve good quality improvement by the stipulation of main priority. This study used a Qualitative data method by scoring, in calculation scale. A statement or question requiring alternative response, such as: very satisfied, satisfied, less satisfied, not satisfied at all, respectively with figures given 4 (four), 3 (three), 2 (two), and 1 (one). There are 2 types of data namely qualitative and quantitative data. Quantitative data is classified into discrete/nominal data and continue data. Nominal data are data that can only be classified individually, in discrete or categorical. These data were collected by calculation outcomes, for instance in a class, there are 50 students consisting of 30 males and 20 females. Study results suggested that factors becoming main priority or at Quadrant IV on cartesius diagram that should be performed as customers expectation among others: Teller attention to customers, all employees’ integrity in terms of servicing customers, waiting time in ATM queue, the presence of ATM machine, Interest Rate given by bank currently. Since those factors identify factors or attributes considered to have influenced customers service including components perceived crucial, however the management has not performed as customers expect, consequently, it is disappointing/unsatisfying

Kata Kunci

Services;Satisfactory;Bank Performance

Teks Lengkap:



Basuki, 2020, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Penerbit Media Sains Indonesia, Bandung.

Kotler Philip, 1997, Manajemen Pemasaran Jilid 2, PT Prenhallindo, Jakarta.

Kolter Philip dan Amstrong Garya, 1997, Dasar- dasar Pemasaran, PT.Prenhallindo, Jakarta.

Novel Muhamad, AM, 2021, Menggali Potensi Diri Meningkatkan Kepuasan Nasabah, Warta Bank Mandiri Nomor 1,April 2021.

Sejoseno Aji Haryo R, 2019, Analisis Sikap Konumen Terhadap keputusan Menjadi Nasabah PT. Bank Mandiri (Persero) Cabang Sleman, Tesis tidak dipublukasikan, Yogyakarta.

Santoso, S., 2000, SPSS Statistik Parametrik, Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.

Supranto, J., 1997, Pengukuran Tingkat Kepuasan Pelanggan, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Supranto, J., 1992, Teknik Sampling Untuk Survei dan Eksperimen, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Sulistiono, Puji, ,2021, Indikator Kepuasan Pelanggan Dalam Upaya Pemenuhan Elemen-elemen ISO 9001:2000, Tesis, Yogyakarta.

Usmara.A, 2003.Strategi Baru Manajemen Pemasaran, Amara Books, Yogyakarta.

Widyanti, Rahmi, 2019/2020, Perilaku Organisasi: Teori dan Konsep, Penerbit Media Sains Indonesia, Bandung



  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.

Al Kalam : Jurnal Komunikasi, Bisnis, dan Manajemen by adalah ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional.