Konten Video Parodi pada Platform Digital dalam Perspektif Pelindungan Hak Cipta dan Doktrin Fair Use

Shafira Shava Rahmanissa(1*), Sudjana Sudjana(2), Sudaryat Sudaryat(3)

(1) Universitas Padjadjaran
(2) Universitas Padjadjaran
(3) Universitas Padjadjaran
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Parody video content on digital platforms is generally made by imitating previous works, but in it, there are also characteristics of parody makers that are different from the original work. The purpose of this study was to determine the application of the fair use doctrine, namely the doctrine that allows the use of copyrighted material without the creator's permission concerning parody video content on digital platforms and to describe the copyright protection of parody video content reviewed under Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. This research is normative legal research by examining library materials or secondary data. The approach method used is a conceptual approach (conceptual approach), statutory approach (statute approach), and comparative approach (comparative approach). The data were obtained through a literature study using primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. These data were processed and analyzed, then presented in a qualitative descriptive manner. The results of the study show that the application of the fair use doctrine to parody video content on digital platforms is limited in some instances. Parody video content can be considered fair use if it meets the indicators required in the provisions of Article 43 letter d or Article 44 paragraph (1) letter a UUHC. These indicators include being non-commercial, benefiting the creator or copyright holder of the original work, or he expresses no objection, or as long as the parody video content mentions and includes the full name of the creator or copyright holder of the original work, aims to criticize an issue, and does not harm the interests of the original work. From the creator or the copyright holder of the original work. Copyright protection can apply to parody video content on digital platforms made with the permission of the creator or copyright holder of the original work and are original, namely as derivative works. However, parody video content does not meet the requirements as a derivative work or is even proven to violate Copyright. In that case, it cannot be protected unless it is considered fair use.


Keywords


law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Budi Agus Riswandi, & dkk. (2017). Pembatasan dan Pengecualian Hak Cipta di Era Digital. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Damian, E. (2019). Hukum Hak Cipta. PT Alumni.

Jacques, S. (2019) The Parody Exception in Copyright Law. Oxford University Press.

Jened, R. (2104). Hukum Hak Cipta (Copyright Law). PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Ramli, A. M. (2018). Hak Cipta, Disrupsi Digital, Ekonomi Kreatif. PT Alumni.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2018). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.

Sudaryat, Sudjana, & Pertama, R. R. (2010). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Oase Media.

Jurnal dan Publikasi Lainnya

Aini, F. N., & Wauran, I. (2021). Pemenuhan Prinsip Fair Use dalam Cover Lagu Berdasar Hukum Hak Cipta Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 15(1), 111. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2021.v15.

Dewi, A. A. M. S. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Hak Cipta Terhadap Cover Version Lagu di YouTube. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana. 6(4). https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2017.v06.i04.p09.

Faza, H. A.. Permata, R. R., & Ramli, T. S. (2021). Pengaturan Monetisasi Pemanfaatan Hak Cipta Lagu Tanpa Seizin Pencipta Pada Aplikasi Digital di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Dan Undang Undang Informasi Transaksi Dan Elektronik. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora. 5(2). https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v5i2.17193.

Geriya, A. A. G. M. (2021). Pelanggaran dan Kebijakan Perlindungan Hak Cipta di YouTube. Jurnal Living Law. 13(2). https://ojs.unida.ac.id/livinglaw/article/view/4261.

Hasibuan, A. N. (2011). Perlindungan Hak Cipta atas Karya Derivatif dalam Prakteknya: Studi Kasus Buku Ensikopedia Al-Quran: Al-Maushuah Al-Quraniyah Al-Muyassarah. Universitas Indonesia.

Kusumaningtyas, R.F. (2022). Adaptation Works as Original Creations from an Intellectual Property Perspective (Study of Fans Fiction Works), European Alliance for Innovation, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/eai.8-6-2021.2314373.

Lengkong, M. R., Rumimpunu, D. & Roeroe, S. D. L. (2021). Perlindungan Hak Cipta Terhadap Pengubahan Aransemen Musik Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta. Lex Privatum. 9(12).

Losung, A.D., Sepang, M. & Koesoemo, A. T. (2021). Kajian Hukum Tentang Pelanggaran Hak Cipta Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Hak Cipta. Lex Privatum. 9(9).

Mayana, R. F. & Santika T. (2022). Educational Fair Use & Digital Learning: Comparative Study Between Indonesia & Myanmar. Jurnal Litigasi. 23(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v23i2.5181.

McDave, K. E. (2020). Originality in Derivative Works: The Academy Logo in the Light of United Kingdom, South African and Ghanaian Copyright Laws. US-China Law Review. 17(8). doi: 10.17265/1548-6605/2020.08.004.

Ndoen, M. R. & Monika, H. (2019(. Prinsip Fair Use Terhadap Cover Version Lagu Dalam Perspektif Perlindungan Hak Cipta (Perbandingan Antara Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Indonesia Dengan Amerika Serikat), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.51342/plj.v1i1.42.

Nurdahniar, I. (2016). Analisis Penerapan Prinsip Perlindungan Langsung dalam Penyelenggaraan Pencatatan Ciptaan. Veritas et Justitia. 2(1).

Permata, R. R., Ramli, T. S., Utama, Y. & Millaudy, R. A. (2021). Regulasi Doktrin Fair Use Terhadap Pemanfaatan Hak Cipta Pada Platform Digital Semasa dan/atau Pasca Pandemi Covid-19. Dialogia Iuridica. 13(1). https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v13i1.3750.

Rahma, H. & Nurhayati, Y. (2020). Legalitas Cover Song yang Diunggah ke Akun YouTube. Jurnal Al Adl. 12(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v12i1.2606.

Ramli, T. S., Ramli, A. M., & Permata, R. R. (2020). Aspek Hukum Atas Konten Hak Cipta Dikaitkan Dengan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik No. 19 Tahun 2016. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(1), 62–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v17i1.589.

Sari, P. E. (2020). Kebutuhan Perluasan Doktrin Orisinalitas Fiksasi dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Sebagai Perlindungan Kreativitas Anak Bangsa. Dharmasisya: Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI. 1(1)

Sudjana, S. (2018). Implikasi Doktrin “Fair Use” Terhadap Pengembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan Oleh Akademisi (Dosen) atau Peneliti Dalam Perspektif Hukum Hak Cipta. Veritas et Justitia. 4(2). https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.2993.

_____. (2016). Sistem Perlindungan Atas Ciptaan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta Dalam Perspektif Cyber Law. Veritas et Justitia. 2(2). https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v2i2.2267.

Sulasno & Dwisvimiar, I. (2021). Penerapan Kepentingan Yang Wajar (Fair Use) Mengenai Materi Hak Cipta di Internet. Hukum Dan Masyarakat Madani, 11(2), 425–437. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/humani.v11i2.4355.

Internet

Google, “Berbagi keuntungan menggunakan Kreator Musik”, https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/12657860?hl=id, diakses pada 28 Desember 2022.

Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Parodi. Diambil, dari https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/parodi, diakses pada tanggal 13 Juli 2022.

Ong-Pizzaro, A. (2021). Squid Game Creator Gives His Thoughts on MrBeast’s YouTube Version. https://screenrant.com/squid-game-mrbeast-video-hwang-dong-hyuk-reaction/, diakses pada tanggal 19 September 2022.

TikTok. Monetisasi di TikTok. https://support.tiktok.com/id/business-and-creator, diakses pada tanggal 19 September 2022.

YouTube. Aturan dan Kebijakan Hak Cipta: Membuat klaim. https://www.youtube.com/howyoutubeworks/policies/copyright/#making-claims, diakses pada tanggal 19 September 2022.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Berne Convention for Protection of Literary and Artistic Works 1886.

US Copyright Act 1976.

Information Society Directive 2001.

Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta.

Putusan Pengadilan

Putusan United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit tentang Brownmark Films, LLC v. Comedy Partners, et.al. 2012. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-ca7-11-02620/context, diakses pada tanggal 25 Juli 2022.

Putusan Court of Justice of the European Union tentang Deckmyn vs. Vandersteen, et.al. 2014. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62013CJ0201, diakses pada tanggal 25 Juli 2022.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v15i1.9351

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Shafira Shava Rahmanissa, Sudjana Sudjana, Sudaryat Sudaryat

Creative Commons License

Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum is licensed under is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.