Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Fidusia Melalui Pendekatan Restorave Justice

Iwan Riswandie(1*)

(1) Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Criminal acts are usually resolved through a procedural mechanism through the principle of legality with what is outlined through the provisions of the legislation. Restorative justice will be able to solve criminal problems which are not only seen in procedural settlement with an orientation towards punishment but also in the agreement of the parties. Criminal problems related to fiduciary with the criminal provisions of Articles 35 and 36 of the Fiduciary Act must see and be oriented to restorative justice to be able to solve the problem. This paper examines the Settlement of Fiduciary Crimes through a restorative justice approach. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. In conclusion, restorative justice is prioritized not the punishment for the offender, but on how the perpetrator can bear responsibility for the acts committed and how the victim can get justice so that the situation can be recovered. Therefore, the main thing in the settlement of fiduciary crimes is the restoration of the original state, then with the emphasis on criminal law, of course, the debtor as the offender of the violation has the impetus for resolving this case, so that with this agreement with a strong pressure value in criminal law, the opportunity for settlements will be more achievable and far more beneficial than just punishing the offender.


Keywords


Fiduciary Guarantee; Criminal; Restorative Justice; Jaminan Fidusia; Pidana; Restorative Justice.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Gatot Supranoto, Perjanjian Utang Piutang (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2013).

Ibrahim, Jonaedi Efendi dan Johnny, Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif Dan Empiris (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018)

Kamello, H. Tan, and MS SH, Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Suatu Kebutuhan Yang Didambakan (Bandung: Alumni, 2022)

Marlina, Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia, Pengembangan Konsep, Diversi Dan Resztorative Justice (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009)

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Revisi (Jakarta: Prenadamedia, 2015)

Subagiyo, D. T., Hukum Jaminan Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undangan Jaminan Fidusia (Suatu Pengantar) (Surabaya: UWKS PERS, 2018)

Yurizal, Aspek Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang No. 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia (Malang: MNC, 2015)

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 tentang Perbankan.

Jurnal

Febriyanti, Wiwin Dwi Ratna, ‘Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konsitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019’, Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 6.2.

Iwan Riswandie, ‘Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Berasaskan Keadilan Pasca Putusan MK No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019’, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI), 2.3.

Kurniawan, Itok Dwi, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Melalui Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Pembiayaan Kredit Kendaraan Bermotor Roda Dua Ditinjau Dari Presfektif Undang-Undang No. 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia Dan Peraturan Bidang Keuangan’, Jurnal Repertorium, IV.1 (2017).

Lingga, David Kurnia, ‘Pertanggungajawaban Pidana Pemberi Fidusia Yang Karena Kesengajaannya Melahirkan Perjanjian Fidusia Dalam Hubungannhya Dengan Pasal 35 Undang-Undang No, 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Fidusia (Studi Kasus PT. Sinar Mas MultiFinance)’, Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum.

Muhaimin, ‘Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan (Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan’, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE, 19.2 (2019).

Nurhayati, Yati, ‘Perdebatan Antara Metode Normatif Dengan Metode Empirik Dalam Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Ditinjau Dari Karakter, Fungsi, Dan Tujuan Ilmu Hukum’, Jurnal Al Adl, 5.10 (2013).

Sahal Afhami, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Atas Upaya Pihak Ketiga Untuk Meletakan Sita Jaminan’, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI), 2.2 (2021).

Setiyanto, Rosiani Niti Pawitri & Budi, ‘Tinjajuan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pengalihan Obyek Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Pihak Lain Tanpa Persetujuan Tertulis Dari Penerima Fidusia (Studi Kasus Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Wates No. 109/Pid.Sus/2014/PnWat)’, Jurnal Recidive, 3.3.

Tanuwijaya, Kristin & Christine, ‘Penyelesaian Perkara Pidanna Dengan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif (Restoratif Justice) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidan Terpadu Di Indoensia’, Jurnal Mibar Justitia, 1.02 (2015), hlm.596.

Terok, Greggoryo, ‘Fungsi Jaminan Dalam Pemberian Kredit’, Jurnal Lex Privatum, 1.5 (2013).

Yati Nurhayati, Ifrani, & M. Yasir Said, ‘Metodologi Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum’, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2.1 (2021).

Zubaedah, Linda Susilo. Rani Apriani & Rahmi, ‘Kedudukan Jaminan Fidusia Serta Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Lembaga Pembiayaan Konsumen’, Junrnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Pengajarannya, 16 (2021).

Internet

Anonim, ‘Jaminan Fidusia Dan Potensi Dalam Mendorong Laju Ekonomi’ [accessed 30 March 2022]




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v14i2.6972

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Al Adl by Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad albanjari is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://ojs.uniska-bjm.ac.id/index.php/aldli/index