COMPARATIVE LAW AGAINST ONLINE PROSTITUTION ACCORDING TO INDONESIAN AND DUTCH LAW

Muhammad Akbar Ridho(1), Yati Nurhayati(2*)

(1) Uniska MAB
(2) 
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Prostitution is a complex problem. Hence it requires serious and comprehensive attention and handling from some aspects – moral, social, cultural, legal, or norms, etc. The legal norms from various different countries, including Indonesia, categorize prostitution as an illegal action, whereas others are silent with some exceptions. One of the countries legalizing prostitution is the Netherlands. When the Dutch government legalized prostitution in 2000, it was to protect women by giving them work permits. This research focuses on answering how the Comparison of Criminal Law Policies against Online Prostitution in Indonesia and the Netherlands is. The method used was normative legal research. The results showed that Indonesia prohibits prostitution even though the crime uses the relevance between the Criminal Code and certain laws as there is no specific legal policy regarding online prostitution in Indonesia. Meanwhile, the Dutch legal policy in responding to the online prostitution issue, legalizes prostitution with the terms and conditions of the Bibob law.


Keywords


Online Prostitution; Comparative Law; Indonesia; Netherlands

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aloysius Wisnubroto, 2010. Strategi Penanggulangan Kejahatan Telematika, Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

ALTINK, S., Opheffing bordeelverbod: een onderneming voor prostituées, Amsterdam, De Rode Draad, 2000, p.15

Bambang Waluyo, 2014. Viktimologi Perlindungan Korban Dan Saksi, Cet 3, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Barda Nawawi Arief, 2006. Tindak Pidana Mayantara Perkembangan Kajian Cyber Crime di Indonesia, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Bleeker, 2014. Sekswerkers aan het woord. De sociale positie van sekswerkers in Nederland in 2014. Regioplan, Amsterdam.

DAALDER, A.L, 2002. Het bordeelverbod opgeheven: prostitutie in 2000-2001, Den Haag, WODC/Ministerie van Justitie.

DAALDER, A.L., 2007. Prostitutie in Nederland na opheffing van het bordeelverbod, Den Haag, WODC.

DE KLEIN, P., 2002. Prostitutiewetgeving, legalisatie of liquidatie, Excellent Groep.

Dianawati, A, 2006. Pendidikan Seks Untuk Remaja, Kawan Pustaka, Jakarata.

Dikdik M. Arief Mansur Dan Elisatris Gultom, 2008. Urgensi Perlindungan Korban Kejahatan Antara Norma Dan Realita, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.

Dwi Handoko, 2017. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana dan Hukum Panitensier di Indonesia (Dilengkapi dengan Evaluasi Pembelajaran dalam Bentuk Teka-Teki Silang Hukum dan Disertai dengan Humor dalam Lingkup Ilmu dan Pengetahuan tentang Hukum), Pekanbaru: Hawa dan Ahwa.

Eelco van Wijk dan Peter Mascini, 2019. Tanggung jawab pengusaha dalam prostitusi lokal yang dilegalkan di Belanda, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

F.A.F. Lamintang dan Djisman samosir, 2002. Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Sinar Baru, Bandung.

Farhana, 2010. Aspek Hukum Perdagangan Orang di Indonesia, Cet 1, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

FIGHT, S., HULSHOF, P., VAN SOOMEREN, P. en SOORSMA, P., 2006. Evaluatie Opheffing Bordeelverbod: Gemeentelijk Beleid: samenvatting en conclusies, Amsterdam, WODC.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v14i1.6278

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Al Adl by Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad albanjari is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://ojs.uniska-bjm.ac.id/index.php/aldli/index