PENGHENTIAN PERKARA DENGAN DENDA DAMAI PADA TINDAK PIDANA EKONOMI

Authors

  • Rizal Faharuddin Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v16i2.14130

Keywords:

Case settlement, peace fines, economic offences

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to determine the application of peace fines by the Attorney General's Office in the settlement of economic crimes, as well as to find the concept of case termination with peace fines in economic crimes, using progressive legal thinking and restorative justice. The research method used is normative with statutory and comparative approaches sourced from primary data. The results showed that peace fines by the Attorney General in the settlement of economic crimes can be carried out based on Article 35 Paragraph (1) letter K of the Law of the Prosecutor of the Republic of Indonesia, this is an implementation of the principle of Opportunity and the position of the Attorney General as Dominus Litis which has permanent legal force. This is in line with the application of case settlement with the principle of restorative justice which prioritises victim recovery. The concept of case termination with a peace fine for taxation, customs, and economic crimes, is carried out with the principle of restorative justice, which is carried out by taking into account the interests of state revenue, there are no elements of corruption, and with the approval of the Attorney General by considering the impact caused by the criminal act, the costs and benefits of handling the case, as well as the guilty statement of the perpetrator and his willingness to pay a peace fine. The conditions for case termination are that the perpetrator is the first time involved in a criminal offence and there has been a restoration to the original state carried out by the perpetrator of the criminal offence.


Keywords: Termination of case; peaceful fine; economic crime.

Author Biography

  • Rizal Faharuddin, Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia
    Penulis adalah Kepala Seksi Tindak Pidana Narkotika dan Zat Adiktif Lainnya pada Asisten Tindak Pidana Umum Kejaksaan Tinggi SUlawesi Tengah

References

Abidin, A.Z. (1983). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita.

Faharuddin, R. (2021). Sanksi Reparatif pada Pemidanaan Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta: Litera.

Faharuddin, R. & Hakim, J. (2023). Restorative Justice for Corruption Cases the Settlement of Corruption Cases: is it Possible?, Yuridika, 38 (1), 73-94.

DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v38i1.42511

Hamzah, A. (1988). Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

_____. (2006). Laporan Tim Analisa dan Evaluasi Hukum Tentang Pelaksanaan Asas Oportunitas Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Diakses pada 20 Januari 2024, dari https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/pelaksanaan_asas_oportunitas_dalam_hukum_acara_pidana.

Hartiwiningsih. & Primasari, L. (2021). Hukum Pidana Ekonomi. Banten: Universitas Terbuka.

Iswari, F. & Azriadi. (2022). Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Serta Pengaturannya Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Sumbang 12 Law Journal, 1 (1), 1-22. Diakses pada 11 Januari 2024 dari https://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/smb12lj/article/view/3527

Kristiana, Y. (2007). Rekonstruksi Birokrasi Kejaksaan dengan Pendekatan Hukum Progresif, Studi Penyelidikan, Penyidikan, dan Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Semarang: Disertasi di Universitas Diponegoro.

Lamintang, P.A.F. & Simons, D. (1992). Kitab Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. 1. Bandung: Pioner Jaya.

Mamengko, J.F.R. (2012). Denda Damai dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Ekonomi." Lex Crimen, 1 (1), 89-104. Diakses pada 11 Januari 2024 dari https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/350/275

Marpaung, L. (1991). Tindak Pidana Penyelundupan Masalah dan Pemecahannya. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Marzuki, P.M. (2007). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group.

Prodjodikoro, W. (1989). Asas - asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Eresco.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Hukum Progresif, Sebuah Sintesa Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Gentha Publishing.

Riyanto, T.A. (2021). Fungsionalisasi Prinsip Dominus Litis Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Lex Renaissan, 6 (3), 481-492.

DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss3.art4.

Setiadi, E. (2000). Reformasi Hukum Pidana, Untuk mengantisipasi Perkembangan Kejahatan di Bidang Ekonomi (Economic Crimes). Jurnal Sosial Pembangunan, 16 (3), 205-214.

DOI; 10.29313/mimbar.v16i3.16.

Sudiro, A. (1996). Ruang Lingkup Tindak Pidana Ekonomi di Bidang Perbankan. Era Hukum, 3 (3), 57-58.

DOI: 10.24912/era%20hukum.v3i3.5220

Downloads

Published

2024-08-11

Issue

Vol. 16 No. 2 (2024)

Section

Artikel

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).