THE INFLUENCE OF FIELD INDEPENDENCE-DEPENDENCE IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

Rima Cahaya Febrina(1), nasrullah - -(2*), Elsa Rosalina(3), Inayati Fitriyah Asrimawati(4)

(1) Lambung Mangkurat University
(2) Lambung Mangkurat University
(3) Lambung Mangkurat University
(4) Lambung Mangkurat University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


One of indicators that marked individual differences in Second Language Acquisition is learning style. Individuals have been cognitively described as field independent and field dependent, according to whether they approach things in details or holistically. However, there is not enough study that discusses the relationship between field independence-dependence and success in language learning. This study aims to explore the influence of field independence-dependence on second language learning success. The method used in this study is a literature review. The data are collected from previous journal articles using thematic analysis. The expected findings of this study are there may be a cognitive style bias operating in relation with second language learning success. Hopefully this study contributes as additional knowledge of that particular topic in the field of Second Language Acquisition


Keywords


Field dependence; field independence; second language acquisition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, H. D. (1994). Affective variables in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 23, 231–244.

Carter, E. F. (1988). The relationship of field dependent/independent cognitive style to Spanish languagr achievement and proficiency: A preliminary report. The Modern Language Journal, 72(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1988.tb04163.x

Chapelle, C., & Roberts, C. (1986). Ambiguity tolerance and field independence as predictors of proficiency in English as a second language. Language Learning, 36(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1986.tb00367.x

Coffield, F., Ecclestone, K., Hall, E., & Moseley, D. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review. Learning and Skills Research Centre. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/69027.

Cohen, V. L. (2001). Learning styles and technology in a ninth-grade high school population. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 355–366.

Czizer, K., & Dornyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 19–36.

Dornyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). Individual Difference in Second Language Learning. In The handbook of second language acquisitions.

Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding Second Language Acquisition (2nd edition) (2nd ed.). Oxford Univeristy Press.

Governor, D. (1998). Cognitive styles and metacognition in web based instruction. Retrieved October, 30. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&hl=en&cites=6327046696643690856&as_sdt=5

Hall, J. K. (2000). Field dependence-independence and computer-based instruction in geography. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Hanse, J., & Stansfield, C. (1981). The Relationship of field dependent-independent cognitive styles to foreign language achievement. Language Learning, 31(2), 349–367.

Hayes, J., & Allison, C. W. (1998). Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations, 51(7), 847–880.

Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning Style: An Overview. In. In Students learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1–17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Kinsella, K. (1995). Understanding and empowering diverse learners in the ESL classroom. In Understanding learning styles in the second language classroom. Heinle & Heinle.

Maghsudi, M. (2007). The interaction between field dependent/independent learning styles and learners’ linguality in third language acquisition. Language in India, 7(5).

Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19(2), 59–74.

O’Brien, T. P., Butler, S. M., & Bernold, L. E. (2001). Group embedded figures test and academic achievement in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(1), 89–92.

Reid, J. M. (1995). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Saha, A. (2018). Field independence and field dependence factor in SLA and their impact on second language acquisition. Brac University.

Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: essence and origins. Field dependence and field independence. Psychological Issue, 1–141.

Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1977). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1–64.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/intensive.v5i2.7930

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.







Intensive Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 

StatCounter - Free Web Tracker and Counter

View My Stats