KAJIAN TERHADAP UU CIPTA KERJA KLUSTER LINGKUNGAN HIDUP ATAS DIHAPUSNYA PRINSIP STRICT LIABILITY

Nurul Listiyani(1*), Rakhmat Nopliardy(2)

(1) Universitas islam Kalimantan MAB
(2) Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB
(*) Corresponding Author

Sari


Indonesia adapted the concept of strict liability for the disposal of B3 (Hazardous and Toxic Materials) waste into the 1982 and 1997 Environmental Management Laws. However, only in the Environmental Management and Protection Act Number 32 of 2009 (UUPPLH), this principle more firmly listed. UUPPLH emphasizes that as long as there is an action that causes damage, the perpetrator must be responsible for restitution or compensation for damage to the victim without the need for supporting evidence. This principle has proven to be effective in instructing corporations to provide material compensation (ecosystem rehabilitation and compensation to victims) and immaterial (for example, counseling assistance to victims who have lost their livelihoods due to environmental damage). The enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation/Omnibus Law as a national legal development policy directed at the ideological role model of legal centralism (legal centralism resulted in a shift in policy in the agrarian and environmental sectors. The abolition of the strict liability principle in the Job Creation Law will increase opportunities corporations escape legal proceedings for environmental crimes they commit and add to the burden on victims. From the normative study, it can be seen that the principle of absolute responsibility is used in carrying out a person's activity which is categorized as ultrahazardous (very dangerous) so that person has an obligation to bear all losses that arise. The disappearance of the phrase "without the need to prove an element of guilt" in the Job Creation Act is one of the setbacks in environmental law enforcement. The Job Creation Act shifts the policy of criminal sanctions against environmental crimes with administrative sanctions that are prioritized as stated in Article 82B paragraph (2) letter a

Keywords: Corporation, omnibus law, strict liability, law enforcement


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Ali, C., 1987. Badan Hukum. 1 ed. Bandung: Alumni.

Andri, W., 2022. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. [Online]

Available at: https://law.ui.ac.id/guru-besar-fhui-kritisi-kekeliruan-strict-liability-dan-sanksi-dalam-ruu-cipta-kerja/, diakses tanggal 27 Juli 2022, pukul 13.44 Wita.

[Accessed Selasa Juli 2022].

Anindita, S. L., 2017. Perkembangan Ganti Rugi Kerugian dalam Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 3(2), p. 336.

Arief, B. N., 2003. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana,. 2 ed. Bandung: PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.

Asshiddiqie, J., 2020. Omnibus Law dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. 1 ed. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press (Konpress).

Fadhli, R., 2018. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan. Jurnal Renaissance Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, 3(2), p. 2018.

Hamzah, A., 2008. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. 1 ed. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Hatrik, H., 1996. Asas Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Strict Liability dan Vicarious Liability. 1 ed. Jakarta: Raja Grafindio Perkasa.

Husin, S., 2020. Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan. 1 ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Koeswadji, H. H., 1993. Hukum Pidana Lingkungan. 1 ed. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti,.

Listiyani, N. & M.A., H. &. M. S., 2018. Penomormaan Pengawasan Izin Lingkungan dalam Pencegahan Pencemaran dan Kerusakaan Lingkungan Hidup dalam Ekploitasi Sumber Daya Alam. Media Hukum, 25(2).

Listiyani, N. & Said, M. Y., 2018. Political Law on the Environment : The Authority of the Government and Local Government to File Litigation in Law Number 32 Year 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management. Resources, 7(4), p. 77.

Low, P. W., 1990. Criminal Law, Revised First Edition. Revisi ed. St. Paul, Minn: West Publishing Co.

Marzuki, P. M., 2022. Penelitian Hukum. Surabaya: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Muladi, D. P., 2012. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana. 3 ed. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grub.

Rahardjo, S., 2014. Ilmu Hukum. 8 ed. Bandung: Alumni.

Rahmadi, T., 2003. Hukum Pengelolaan Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun. 1 ed. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Prayito, D., 2017. Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Kebijakan Legislas. 1 ed. Depok: Kencana.

Santosa, A. A. G. D. H., 2021. Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Pencemaran Lingkungan (suatu perbandingan UU PPLH dengan Omnibus law kluster lingkungan hidup). Komunikasi Hukum, 7(1).

Setiawan, E., 2019. Putusan Pemidanaan Sebagai Pengganti Denda yang Tidak Dibayar oleh Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup. Badamai Law Journal, 4(1), p. 62.

Sjahdeini, S., 2017. Ajaran Pemidanaan: Tindak Pidana Korporasi & Seluk-Beluknya. 1 ed. Jakarta: Kencana.

Yustanti, D., 2019. Tindak Pidana Pembakaran Hutan Dan Lahan Oleh Korporasi Untuk Membuka Usaha Perkebunan (The Crime Of Forest And Lan Slash And Burn By Corporation To Clear Land For Estate Purpose). jurnal penelitian hukum de jure, 19(4).

Zaidan, M. A. Z., 2016. Kebijakan Kriminal. 1 ed. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/alsh.v8i2.8274

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Al-Ulum : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora by https://ojs.uniska-bjm.ac.id/index.php/ALSH is licensed under is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.